<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Native Lambda Expressions in C++? Yes Please!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ridgesolutions.ie/index.php/2009/01/05/native-lambda-functions-in-c-yes-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ridgesolutions.ie/index.php/2009/01/05/native-lambda-functions-in-c-yes-please/</link>
	<description>Engineered Software</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Conlon</title>
		<link>http://www.ridgesolutions.ie/index.php/2009/01/05/native-lambda-functions-in-c-yes-please/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Conlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridgesolutions.ie/?p=54#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Actually there are a whole slew of features in the c++0x draft that I am looking forward to using (as explained in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x). Lots of simple usability features but Lambda's and standardisation of concurrancy features are what I think will be important/useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there are a whole slew of features in the c++0x draft that I am looking forward to using (as explained in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x</a>). Lots of simple usability features but Lambda&#8217;s and standardisation of concurrancy features are what I think will be important/useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
